April 2018 marked the second anniversary of Aung San Suu Kyi assuming the position of state councillor of Myanmar. Despite predictions that Myanmar’s tentative steps towards democracy would weaken the country’s long-standing relationship with Beijing, the security situation in Myanmar’s border regions and tepid relations with the West ensure that China remains the Suu Kyi government’s dominant regional partner.
Over the past two years the National League for Democracy (NLD) government has struggled to address several policy priorities, including economic liberalisation and the numerous security challenges in the country’s border regions.
The civilian government has had to adjust to an uneasy symbiosis with the Myanmar Armed Forces, or Tatmadaw. The Tatmadaw still holds much influence over the government, overseeing of more than 25 per cent of upper- and lower-house seats in the Parliament, as well as key posts such as the Ministry of Defence.
The limits of civilian authority are well illustrated by the crisis in Myanmar’s northwestern Rakhine State, which has seen a mass exodus of hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees into neighbouring Bangladesh since August 2017.
Myanmar slipping back into isolation cannot be discounted
The Rakhine crisis has had a negative effect on Myanmar’s attempts to “come in from the cold” after a long period of diplomatic seclusion under the previous military junta.
The possibility of the country slipping back into isolation cannot be discounted.
Beijing was one of Myanmar’s few regional friends during the country’s period of military rule. Divisions appeared, however, as Myanmar began to move towards political reform under then-president Thein Sein.
This was illustrated by the Sein government’s suspension in 2011 of the China-backed Myitsone Dam project because of local opposition and friction caused by the cross-border smuggling of goods such as jade and lumber.
Yet, in June 2015 Chinese President Xi Jinping met with then-opposition leader Suu Kyi — a strong indicator that Beijing was open to the possibility of democratic reform in Myanmar and was willing to build relations with an NLD-backed government.
Resources essential for China’s BRI
After the current Myanmar government took office, the country’s economic relations with China remained strong, with bilateral trade figures estimated at $10.8 billion for the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year.
Beijing views Myanmar as an essential component of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), given Myanmar’s resource endowments and its location on the Indian Ocean.
A key component of the BRI has been an ambitious deep-sea port project in Kyaukpyu on the Bay of Bengal, in which China assumed a 70 per cent stake in October 2017.
BRI projects in Myanmar, in addition to initiatives and economic diplomacy in other areas of the Indian Ocean, have raised concerns about strategic encirclement with Myanmar’s other big-state neighbour: India. China has been courting the Maldives, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, and opened its first overseas military installation in Djibouti in 2017.
Over the past two years, Beijing has sought to soften the impression that its Myanmar diplomacy is largely based on resource interests and geo-economics.
A November 2017 meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Suu Kyi saw a proposal for an “economic corridor” between Myanmar and the neighbouring Chinese province of Yunnan to enhance Myanmar’s development.
Any development in this area will be contingent upon stabilising the border region, which is still subject to violence by ethnic militias, including the Kachin Independence Army (KIA). Other groups, such as the United Wa State Army (UWSA), have tentatively accepted a cease-fire with the central government.
China has pledged its support for a comprehensive peace deal in the wake of concerns about smuggling, the drug trade, and refugee flows into China. It is also concerned about the potentially adverse effects on cross-border trade and joint infrastructure projects, such as the Myitsone Dam. Several of the ethnic militias, including the UWSA, have stressed that China’s ongoing involvement in the peace process is essential to the success of the talks.
While Beijing has largely sought to remain neutral on the Rohingya situation, in October 2017 the Xi government offered a “three-phase” solution to the Rakhine crisis.
The phases would be: a cease-fire to prevent further refugee flows followed by the establishment of a stable line of communication between Bangladesh and Myanmar to jointly tackle the crisis. Llastly a long-term solution to acknowledge widespread poverty in Rakhine as a factor in the humanitarian emergency.
But an end to the crisis remains elusive despite ongoing international pressure. While China wishes to be seen as a responsible great power in encouraging an end to the crisis, the country is also concerned about the future of the Kyaukpyu project, which is based in Rakhine and is considered an essential component of the BRI.
The stage appeared to be set in 2016 for a diversification in Myanmar’s foreign policy, given initial enthusiasm in East Asia and the West for building new ties with the Suu Kyi administration. But the events in Rakhine State have greatly slowed this process.
The United States re-introduced select sanctions on Myanmar in December 2017, and the country appears to be a low priority for the US government. Beijing appears to remain in a dominant position as it applies to Myanmar’s foreign policy, a relationship poised to affect future Western diplomacy and strategy in Southeast Asia.
This article was written by Marc Lanteigne, a senior lecturer at the Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies, Massey University. It first appeared on East Asia Forum under a Creative Commons License and is reproduced here with its permission.
Feature photo eng.china.mil/ mod. gov. cn/Li Xiaowei
- Chinese state councilor meets Myanmar leaders on bilateral relations (Xinhua)
- Chinese port project could land Myanmar in debt trap (The Straits Times)
- China does not want U.N. to push Myanmar on accountability (Reuters)
It consists of an online publication and a quarterly magazine, East Asia Forum Quarterly, which aim to provide clear and original analysis from the leading minds in the region and beyond.
Latest posts by East Asia Forum (see all)
- Words hurt: time for Asean leaders to speak up on SCS – May 8, 2019
- Fake news: Sri Lanka loses port over Chinese BRI debt – April 9, 2019
- Friends in need: Asean’s financial safety net stigmatised & shunned – March 22, 2019
- Uncoordinated efforts leave Cambodia foreign policy lacking synergy – March 19, 2019