Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security (MoPS) thinks that it is killing two birds with one stone by passing new laws regulating data storage. But it could soon find out it has no use for two dead birds while the stone flies off and damages the economy.
In June 2017, the MoPS proposed a draft cybersecurity law that will require all foreign online service providers (including Facebook, Google and Twitter) to store their Vietnamese users’ data exclusively in Vietnamese data centres — a practice known as ‘data localisation’.
Foreign tech firms would likely have Vietnamese partners run their local data centres, manage domestic service sales and handle government requests for user data. The proposal has sparked a heated debate between those who believe in its benefits and those who warn against its serious threats to economic development.
For proponents of the law, data localisation is a no-brainer. The opening of local data centres will improve access to online services for local users and will generate a booming demand for high-skilled IT professionals.
With 64 million social media users and one of the fastest-growing e-commerce markets worldwide, Vietnam would be an irresistible destination for foreign tech firms regardless of the extra cost of data localisation, or at least so thinks the Ministry.
In a broader context, proponents of the law see the mandate as part of a global effort to protect data privacy and to stop multinationals from pursuing tax avoidance strategies.
In 2015 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbour Agreement (SHA), which had allowed the free transfer of data between the European Union (EU) and the United States. This invalidation resulted in many US tech giants’ storing all EU citizen data on servers located within the EU.
Furthermore, as most nations search for ways to quash tax avoidance by multinationals, the MoPS sees data localisation as a promising solution when it is combined with the recent Ministry of Finance (MoF) proposal requiring all cross-border payments to be made via domestic payment gateways.
Similar authentication schemes have been implemented in India and South Korea. ‘If others can do this’, reason proponents of the law, ‘why can’t we?’. The answer is simple: Vietnam can, but it shouldn’t.
Empty Promises, Few Jobs
Access to foreign online services will be much better if the government had relaxed its onerous regulations and censorship rules instead of adding more.
Evidence on data localisation reveals mostly empty promises: even if foreign tech firms cave in to the mandate, the resulting number of high-quality jobs would be minimal. Data centres are increasingly being automated — Apple’s billion-dollar data centre in North Carolina created only 50 permanent jobs.
More importantly, data localisation will not improve data privacy at all — even though this is the key rationale for the proposal.
Data privacy depends on the service providers’ technical capabilities, the quality of physical infrastructures and the robustness of administrative procedures. This is true regardless of where the servers are located. Given Vietnam’s relatively less-developed IT infrastructure and workforce, data localisation will likely increase the chances of security breaches.
In addition, data localisation under Vietnam’s strict censorship rules will be detrimental to data privacy. Until now, foreign tech companies who store user data outside Vietnam can avoid comprehensively complying with government censorship.
Were the system to change, government agencies could force tech firms to provide them with users’ personal information in accordance with Decree 72 on the Management, Provision and Use of Internet Services and Online Information.
A Setback For Vietnam’s Economy
While the benefits of data localisation are mostly imaginary, its threats to Vietnam’s economic development are real. The past three decades of economic transition attest to the importance of opening up the economy and attracting quality investment with a facilitating state that ensures a conducive business environment.
The proposed mandate will betray all of these, which will result in higher costs of doing business and an even more restricted flow of information. And it will likely lead to heavier state intervention in the economy.
Current data regulations are already estimated to cost the Vietnamese economy a 1.7 per cent reduction in GDP and a 3.1 per cent reduction in domestic investment. These figures will undoubtedly be higher if data localisation is passed.
Vietnam’s political leaders have repeatedly highlighted Singapore as a model for the country’s major cities. If their statements hold any merit, they should know that Singapore does not need a data localisation mandate to attract foreign tech firms to set up data centres, or bring high-skilled jobs into the country.
Data localisation will be a setback for Vietnam’s emerging economy. The only light in this darkness is that the draft law still awaits the National Assembly’s consideration in May 2018. Let us hope that members of the highest organ of state power use their votes wisely.
This article was written by Phan Le, a PhD candidate at the Australian National University (ANU). It first appeared on East Asia Forum under a Creative Commons License and is reproduced here with its permission.
- Vietnam’s Internet is in trouble (Washington Post)
- Vietnam beats US in new 4G speed survey, ranks second in Southeast Asia (VnExpress)
- 170 Vietnamese websites attacked during Lunar New Year (Viet Nam News)
It consists of an online publication and a quarterly magazine, East Asia Forum Quarterly, which aim to provide clear and original analysis from the leading minds in the region and beyond.
Latest posts by East Asia Forum (see all)
- Pragmatic & risk-averse: little change expected under Nguyen Phu Trong (video) – December 10, 2018
- Putin’s Singapore visit signals continued Russia-Asean interest – December 7, 2018
- Trade war: Focus turns to Thailand to conclude $7 trln RCEP – December 6, 2018
- Indonesia’s WSMEs: female entrepreneurship without a safety net – December 3, 2018